Postare

solana:9ghptGzBCRiHe3eMvjkBqrHE8oodbVZjD1BYzqLdpump is gigabrain and very fun, but I'm seeing lots of depositor confusion so lets go over how earning works As a depositor, you put in an nft + some "backing" of eth. if an acquirer spins and hits your nft, you're out of the game no matter what choice they pick (keep nft, acquire eth, acquire FWA). so thats a loss of the value of the nft or eth, you get sent back whichever the winner didn't take. So you're earning as long as you aren't hit. Now, there are two ways of earning as a depositor: 1) you earn a split of the ETH fees on spin based on NUMBER of NFTs you have listed. the backing value of those NFTs does not matter for this fee split 2) you earn emissions of FWA based on the backing value of your listings. Does not matter how many listings you have The backing you put up is not priced by the NFT that you are depositing, so you can actually put a much higher backing than the floor price. This is why you see a lot of deposits on FWA of low value nfts listed with a backing of 0.5-1ETH or more. hypothetically, this means that only those with very valuable NFTs deposited earn protocol tokens which feels very aligned. but this leads to the biggest problem I see with the protocol, which is that to deposit an NFT you have to have equal amount of value in ETH idle to deposit too. I'm sure there are many people with valuable NFTs who don't have the ETH to pair with it for deposit, so this may very well end up just being an ETH gambling machine that doesn't pick up valuable NFTs (i.e. lots of cheap NFTs with large ETH backings because thats the best way to farm the token). this feels like it could be much more sustainable if there was some oracle to enforce the backing against the token or auto-settle bids from opensea upon hit. disclosures: i already picked up a FWA bag anyways because I love this kind of onchain experimentation, NFA.